Article ID: | iaor20172104 |
Volume: | 63 |
Issue: | 6 |
Start Page Number: | 1696 |
End Page Number: | 1707 |
Publication Date: | Jun 2017 |
Journal: | Management Science |
Authors: | Chadi Adrian, Jeworrek Sabrina, Mertins Vanessa |
Keywords: | performance, behaviour, statistics: inference |
This experiment tests for a causal relationship between the meaning of work and employees’ motivation to perform well. The study builds on an existing employer–employee relationship, adding realism to the ongoing research of task meaning. Owing to an unexpected project cancelation, we are able to study how varying the information provided about the meaning of previously conducted work–without the use of deception, but still maintaining a high level of control–affects subsequent performance. We observe a strong decline in exerted effort when we inform workers about the meaninglessness of a job already done. Our data also suggests that providing a supplemental alternative meaning perfectly compensates for this negative performance effect. Individual characteristics such as reciprocal inclinations and trust prompt different reactions. The data also show that the meaning of work affects workers’ emotions, but we cannot establish a clear relationship between emotional responses and performance. Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2426.