Article ID: | iaor201525879 |
Volume: | 18 |
Issue: | 1 |
Start Page Number: | 52 |
End Page Number: | 65 |
Publication Date: | Mar 2015 |
Journal: | International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management |
Authors: | Bouzon Arlette, Devillard Jolle |
Keywords: | quality & reliability, risk, communication |
Going beyond the singularity of some fieldwork, our case study in French aeronautics mobilises theories of situated action and distributed cognition. It is based on a comparative qualitative study of three major companies, and on a quantitative survey among the members of a professional network of engineers, reliability and quality controllers. Our study takes into account the confrontation between the theoretical principles of scientific research in reliability, and the constraints of professional practices within a hierarchised universe. The communicational dimension of risk which emerged some 15 years ago around crisis communication appears to constitute a major problematics going far beyond crisis. Complexity and risk entail a particular kind of collective conception which differs from that of ordinary products because of the plurality of knowledge and actors involved. All actors, continuously aiming at technico‐economic compromises, must understand one another and interact in an uncertain universe to reach an aim of collective creation while mastering associated risks, a process that depends mainly on the expertise of intermediary objects (plans, reports, and so on) at various steps of the conception by independent actors. But our field observation of these objects suggests the communicational aspect warrants more attention.