Article ID: | iaor20022168 |
Country: | United Kingdom |
Volume: | 12 |
Issue: | Special (5) |
Publication Date: | Dec 2001 |
Journal: | British Journal of Management |
Authors: | Huff Anne Sigismund, Huff James Oran |
Keywords: | practice |
This commentary agrees with Starkey and Madan that business schools must incorporate Mode 2 production methods if they are to be significant knowledge producers in the future. We reinforce their specific suggestions about how that might be accomplished by focusing on learning from early Mode 2 attempts, promoting practitioner research, seeking business co-sponsorship and sheltering some Mode 1 practices and values, including longitudinal reflective research and information storage. We also argue, however, that business schools must go beyond such tasks, difficult and expensive though they are. The way business and business schools currently operate, and are being encouraged to operate, does not address the broader issues of human relevance that concern James March and others. The gap here is a risk for business and society, and appears to require new, Mode 3, methods of knowledge production.