Article ID: | iaor2016444 |
Volume: | 27 |
Issue: | 1 |
Start Page Number: | 161 |
End Page Number: | 178 |
Publication Date: | Jan 2016 |
Journal: | British Journal of Management |
Authors: | Wright April L, Zammuto Raymond F, Liesch Peter W, Middleton Stuart, Hibbert Paul, Burke John, Brazil Victoria |
Keywords: | decision: studies, management, statistics: empirical |
Evidence-based management (EBM) has been subject to a number of persuasive critiques in recent years. Concerns have been raised that: EBM over-privileges rationality as a basis for decision-making; ‘scientific’ evidence is insufficient and incomplete as a basis for management practice; understanding of how EBM actually plays out in practice is limited; and, although ideas were originally taken from evidence-based medicine, individual-situated expertise has been forgotten in the transfer. To address these concerns, the authors adopted an approach of ‘opening up’ the decision process, the decision-maker and the context (Langley et al., 1995). The empirical investigation focuses on an EBM decision process involving an operations management problem in a hospital emergency department in Australia. Based on interview and archival research, it describes how an EBM decision process was enacted by a physician manager. It identifies the role of ‘fit’ between the decision-maker and the organizational context in enabling an evidence-based process and develops insights for EBM theory and practice.