Differences between odd number and even number response formats: Evidence from mainland Chinese respondents

Differences between odd number and even number response formats: Evidence from mainland Chinese respondents

0.00 Avg rating0 Votes
Article ID: iaor20114114
Volume: 28
Issue: 2
Start Page Number: 379
End Page Number: 399
Publication Date: Jun 2011
Journal: Asia Pacific Journal Of Management
Authors: , , ,
Keywords: behaviour, statistics: general
Abstract:

Scholars have speculated that the Chinese may be more reluctant to express their opinions strongly and that this may be reinforced if the odd number response format with a mid‐point option of ‘no opinion’ or ‘neither agree nor disagree’ is provided. This may undermine the quality of survey data because less variances or even inaccurate information will be collected. This study provides empirical evidence from 532 mainland Chinese employees in Beijing to test this speculation. These employees were randomly assigned to complete either an odd number or even number response format questionnaire. In contrast to the speculation, in a wide variety of measures that are relevant to the area of organizational behavior (OB) and human resource management (HRM), it appears that the odd number response format does not show systematic differences when compared with the even number response format. This result holds even for some sensitive measures of personal beliefs, evaluation of and judgments about employing organizations, supervisors, and colleagues. Given the increasing number of studies surveying Chinese and other Asian respondents, we call for further research on this issue.

Reviews

Required fields are marked *. Your email address will not be published.