Pioneering plus a broad product line strategy: Higher profits or deeper losses?

Pioneering plus a broad product line strategy: Higher profits or deeper losses?

0.00 Avg rating0 Votes
Article ID: iaor200968846
Country: United States
Volume: 55
Issue: 6
Start Page Number: 958
End Page Number: 967
Publication Date: Jun 2009
Journal: Management Science
Authors: ,
Keywords: financial
Abstract:

Previous research suggests firms can build a market share advantage by pre-empting later entrants with a broad product line and expanding rapidly into related markets. Whether such a strategy leads to a pioneering profit advantage relative to followers also depends on its cost effects. In this paper, we examine when the market share advantage of a pioneering firm with a broad product line strategy translates into a profit advantage by examining the cost effects of this strategy. Using the profit impact of marketing strategies data and an estimation method that controls for various unobserved factors, we find significant differences between different industry settings. From these contrasting findings, we generate an emerging theoretical framework that we subject to empirical testing. We conjecture, and empirically verify, that creating a broad product line with a versioning strategy‐creating variety from a standard product in anticipating customer demand‐does not increase the pioneering cost disadvantage, and thus results in a pioneering profit advantage. On the other hand, with a tailoring strategy‐creating variety by customizing a product to actual customer demand‐a broad product line substantially increases the pioneering cost disadvantage, thereby making a pre-emption strategy counterproductive.

Reviews

Required fields are marked *. Your email address will not be published.