Article ID: | iaor20073077 |
Country: | United Kingdom |
Volume: | 13 |
Issue: | 1 |
Start Page Number: | 33 |
End Page Number: | 57 |
Publication Date: | Jan 2006 |
Journal: | International Transactions in Operational Research |
Authors: | Cox James F., Mabin Victoria J., Davies John |
Keywords: | decision theory, practice |
Standard OR/MS methods mainly focus on ‘hard’ aspects of problems represented by quantitative or mathematical formulations. Organisational settings typically pose challenges in the use of such methods, in that they may be inadequate to capture the ‘softer’ issues surrounding human behaviours, organisational practices and policies. Over the last 20 years, a number of ‘soft OR’ tools, methods and methodologies have emerged as a means of addressing such challenges, and in this paper, we selectively examine how such methodologies can complement hard and other soft methods. In particular, we examine the potential contribution of the theory of constraints (TOC) and system dynamics (SD) to multi-methodological intervention. We begin by discussing their philosophical underpinnings in relation to other OR/MS methods, and by exploring how such an understanding can provide a theoretical basis for mixing methodologies and for their complementary use. Then, using a case suitable for classroom discussion, the paper provides insights into how the systemic qualities of selected TOC methods and tools may be harnessed in multi-methodological intervention by identifying the communality and complementarity of TOC and other hard and soft OR/MS approaches to problem solving, in particular, the causal loop diagramming method of SD.