| Article ID: | iaor2000212 |
| Country: | United States |
| Volume: | 44 |
| Issue: | 9 |
| Start Page Number: | 1234 |
| End Page Number: | 1248 |
| Publication Date: | Sep 1998 |
| Journal: | Management Science |
| Authors: | Moxnes Erling |
| Keywords: | agriculture & food, ecology, forestry, water |
An exploratory search for explanations of mismanagement of renewable resources, other than the theory of the commons, was performed by an experiment. Eighty-three subjects, mostly recruited from the fisheries sector in Norway, were asked to manage the same simulated virgin fish stock, one subject at a time. Exclusive property rights were granted to rule out the commons problem. Despite perfect property rights, subjects consistently overinvested, leading to an average overcapacity of 60%. The resource was reduced by an average of 15% below its optimal level. Overcapacity and tough ‘quotas’ resemble the situation in Norwegian and other fisheries during the past few decades. The likely explanation of the observed behaviour is mis-perception of feedback, a phenomenon that occurs in many experimental studies of dynamically complex systems. Such misperceptions add a new and important dimension to the problem of renewable resource management, beyond the commons problem.