| Article ID: | iaor19971224 |
| Country: | United States |
| Volume: | 8 |
| Issue: | 3 |
| Start Page Number: | 428 |
| End Page Number: | 552 |
| Publication Date: | Jul 1996 |
| Journal: | Public Budgeting and Financial Management |
| Authors: | Farazmand Ali, Neill Jon Patraic |
| Keywords: | management, decision: studies, politics, government, cost benefit analysis |
Quantitative analysis, the traditional technique for capital budgeting evaluation, is experiencing widespread disuse in decision-making. This is asserted to be due to the inability of cost-benefit analysis to quantify benefits received from public investments. Such analysis fails to take into account qualitative factors and political considerations. Research of a municipal capital budget found only 6.5% of the projects to be primarily justified by cost-benefit analysis. The various processes and structures used in public capital budgeting are argued to be of significance in determining budgetary output.