Article ID: | iaor20173672 |
Volume: | 44 |
Issue: | 5 |
Start Page Number: | 1213 |
End Page Number: | 1233 |
Publication Date: | Sep 2017 |
Journal: | Transportation |
Authors: | Liao Feixiong, van Wee Bert |
Keywords: | engineering, design, performance, vehicle routing & scheduling |
Accessibility is a key concept in transport and land use policies, and infrastructure‐based measures are one important category of accessibility measures. Recently, there has been a significant increase in the attention paid in both academic literature and policy documents to the robustness of the transport system. However, there is not a mature body of literature on the infrastructure‐based accessibility measures expressing this concept. This paper proposes a family of accessibility measures to express the robustness of the transport system. These have in common that they express the number of travel options between a given origin and destination, or to conduct activities. The family of measures is conceptualized by using the multi‐state supernetwork approach. With respect to the travel options, we discuss (1) the overlap of travel routes, and (2) the choices of travel modes (e.g. car versus train; multimodal). With respect to the activities, we discuss (1) the choice of OD pairs as opposed to activity‐travel patterns, and (2) fixed versus flexible activity locations and fixed versus flexible order of activities. We illustrate the travel options and robustness in a multi‐modal transport system between the city centers of the Hague‐Rotterdam‐Dordrecht corridor (The Netherlands).