Article ID: | iaor19931673 |
Country: | United Kingdom |
Volume: | 20 |
Issue: | 3 |
Start Page Number: | 353 |
End Page Number: | 364 |
Publication Date: | May 1992 |
Journal: | OMEGA |
Authors: | Sanders N.R. |
This study compares the performance of judgmental and statistical forecasts, as well as the judgmental revision of statistically derived forecasts, for artificial time series with a number of controlled characteristics. Judgment is found to produce inferior and more biased forecasts overall. However, results suggest that judgmental revision may have a benefit for some low noise series, particularly when statistical techniques are applied ‘blindly’ to the time series.