Article ID: | iaor20163720 |
Volume: | 81 |
Issue: | 2 |
Start Page Number: | 189 |
End Page Number: | 198 |
Publication Date: | Aug 2016 |
Journal: | Theory and Decision |
Authors: | Luo Xiao |
Keywords: | game theory, decision theory, behaviour |
In this paper I scrutinize the ‘rational beliefs’ in the concept of rationalizability in strategic games [Bernheim (Econometrica 52:1007–1028, 1984), Pearce (Econometrica 52:1029–1051, 1984)]. I illustrate through an example that a rationalizable strategy may not be supported by a ‘rational belief’, at least under one plausible interpretation of ‘rational belief’. I offer an alternative formulation of ‘rational belief’ in the concept of rationalizability, which yields a novel epistemic interpretation of the notion of point‐rationalizability.