Article ID: | iaor201522891 |
Volume: | 10 |
Issue: | 2 |
Start Page Number: | 121 |
End Page Number: | 131 |
Publication Date: | Jun 1987 |
Journal: | Journal of Financial Research |
Authors: | Barnhill Theodore M, Jordan James V, Seale William E |
Keywords: | government, investment, economics |
Both Samuelson's maturity hypothesis and the Anderson‐Danthine state variable hypothesis are tested in this study of the variance of Treasury‐bond futures prices. Both maturity and the quarterly refunding of Treasury debt have statistically and economically significant effects on futures price variance. The evidence for a monotonic maturity effect is highly statistically significant and robust to changes in model specification. The quarterly refunding is less statistically significant, and it is not clear whether the greatest effect is in the auction week or two weeks thereafter. Economically, these two predictable effects are of greater importance than a change in the discount rate.