The Mutable Nature of Risk and Acceptability: A Hybrid Risk Governance Framework

The Mutable Nature of Risk and Acceptability: A Hybrid Risk Governance Framework

0.00 Avg rating0 Votes
Article ID: iaor2016272
Volume: 35
Issue: 11
Start Page Number: 1969
End Page Number: 1982
Publication Date: Nov 2015
Journal: Risk Analysis
Authors:
Keywords: management, decision
Abstract:

This article focuses on the fluid nature of risk problems and the challenges it presents to establishing acceptability in risk governance. It introduces an actor‐network theory (ANT) perspective as a way to deal with the mutable nature of risk controversies and the configuration of stakeholders. To translate this into a practicable framework, the article proposes a hybrid risk governance framework that combines ANT with integrative risk governance, deliberative democracy, and responsive regulation. This addresses a number of the limitations in existing risk governance models, including: (1) the lack of more substantive public participation throughout the lifecycle of a project; (2) hijacking of deliberative forums by particular groups; and (3) the treatment of risk problems and their associated stakeholders as immutable entities. The framework constitutes a five‐stage process of co‐selection, co‐design, co‐planning, and co‐regulation to facilitate the co‐production of collective interests and knowledge, build capacities, and strengthen accountability in the process. The aims of this article are twofold: conceptually, it introduces a framework of risk governance that accounts for the mutable nature of risk problems and configuration of stakeholders. In practice, this article offers risk managers and practitioners of risk governance a set of procedures with which to operationalize this conceptual approach to risk and stakeholder engagement.

Reviews

Required fields are marked *. Your email address will not be published.