Article ID: | iaor201525379 |
Volume: | 65 |
Issue: | 9 |
Start Page Number: | 1387 |
End Page Number: | 1395 |
Publication Date: | Sep 2014 |
Journal: | Journal of the Operational Research Society |
Authors: | Parsons David John, Angus Andrew, Brawn Martyn, Morris Joe |
Keywords: | analytic hierarchy process, government |
Local Government Authorities (LGA) in England and Wales have statutory responsibility for the maintenance of Public Rights of Way (PROW), such as pathways and byways open to non‐motorised traffic. The departments responsible have to compete for budgets and justify their expenditure in terms of councils’ priorities, such as well‐being and environment. A need was identified for a simple decision support tool to provide a consistent and transparent framework for assessing the range of possible social and economic benefits from expenditure on PROW. The tool uses the Analytic Hierarchy Process to elicit weights forming the links from path attributes to users and usage to benefits, with a final stage to combine the benefits according to LGA priorities. It was successfully tested through case studies, where improving signage was generally found to be the most cost effective option, giving moderate benefits at low cost, whereas improving the physical conditions of the surface gave greater benefits at relatively high cost.