Article ID: | iaor20116372 |
Volume: | 39 |
Issue: | 8 |
Start Page Number: | 4578 |
End Page Number: | 4593 |
Publication Date: | Aug 2011 |
Journal: | Energy Policy |
Authors: | Bunn Derek, Blyth William |
Keywords: | energy, risk |
Within the EU, there have been calls for governments to provide greater certainty over carbon prices, even though it is evident that their price risk is not entirely due to policy uncertainty. We develop a stochastic simulation model of price formation in the EU ETS to analyse the coevolution of policy, market and technology risks under different initiatives. The current situation of a weak (20%) overall abatement target motivates various technology‐support interventions, elevating policy uncertainty as the major source of carbon price risk. In contrast, taking a firm decision to move to a more stringent 30% cap would leave the EU–ETS price formation driven much more by market forces than by policy risks. This leads to considerations of how much risk mitigation by governments would be appropriate, and how much should be taken as business risk by the market participants.