| Article ID: | iaor20123366 |
| Volume: | 46 |
| Issue: | 5 |
| Start Page Number: | 843 |
| End Page Number: | 854 |
| Publication Date: | Jun 2012 |
| Journal: | Transportation Research Part A |
| Authors: | Hoogendoorn Serge P, Knoop Victor L, Snelder Maaike, van Zuylen Henk J |
| Keywords: | vulnerability |
It is computationally expensive to find out where vulnerable parts in a network are. In literature a variety of methods were introduced that use simple indicators (measured in real‐life or calculated in a traffic simulator) to pre‐determine the seriousness of the delays caused by the blocking of that link and thereafter perform a more detailed analysis. This article reviews the indicators proposed in the literature and assesses the quality of these indicators. Furthermore, a multi‐linear fit of the indicators is made to find a better, combined, indicator to rank the links according to their vulnerability. The article shows that different indicators assess different links to be vulnerable. Also combined they cannot predict the vulnerability of a link. Therefore, it is concluded that to find vulnerable links, one has to look further than link‐based indicators.