Article ID: | iaor20113028 |
Volume: | 81 |
Issue: | 7 |
Start Page Number: | 1419 |
End Page Number: | 1429 |
Publication Date: | Mar 2011 |
Journal: | Mathematics and Computers in Simulation |
Authors: | Kim H S, Croke B F W, Jakeman A J, Chiew F H S |
Keywords: | water, simulation: applications |
The aim is to investigate the consistency or variability of catchment response over time and space and evaluate the predictive error caused by the impacts of climate variability on streamflow. For this purpose, both data‐ and top‐down model‐based analyses of the dynamic relation between rainfall and runoff for selected sub‐catchments have been undertaken. Data analysis techniques (e.g. trend analysis, deconvolution and baseflow filtering) were used to assess the temporal and spatial variation in the hydrologic response characteristics for each site. The lumped conceptual rainfall–runoff model IHACRES CMD (Catchment Moisture Deficit) version is applied to the sub‐catchments to assess the adequacy of the model response in representing the impact of weather patterns on streamflow. Several performance criteria have been used to evaluate the performance of the model in each calibration period using a multi‐criteria approach. The IHACRES‐3S (3 Storage) model is applied to assess low flow behaviour and capture the timing in the switch between baseflow and no flow periods. Rainfall–runoff model performance characteristics of each sub‐catchment are quite related to their incident rainfall regime. Sub‐catchments which are located in a lower rainfall regime show poor to average model performance. The reduction in performance in