Article ID: | iaor20091128 |
Country: | United Kingdom |
Volume: | 96 |
Issue: | 1/3 |
Start Page Number: | 166 |
End Page Number: | 174 |
Publication Date: | Mar 2008 |
Journal: | Agricultural Systems |
Authors: | Bell Lindsay W., Byrne Felicity (nee Flugge), Ewing Mike A., Wade Len J. |
Keywords: | cost benefit analysis |
The development of perennial wheat could have a number of advantages for improving the sustainability of Australian dryland agricultural systems. The profitability that might be expected from perennial wheat of different types was investigated using MIDAS (Model of an Integrated Dryland Agricultural System), a bioeconomic model of a mixed crop/livestock farming system. Although perennial wheat may produce a lower grain yield and quality than annual wheat it is expected inputs of fertiliser, herbicide and sowing costs will be lower. Perennial wheat used solely for grain production was not selected as part of an optimal farm plan under the standard assumptions. In contrast dual-purpose perennial wheat that produces grain and additional forage during summer and autumn than annual wheat can increase farm profitability substantially (AU$20/ha over the whole farm) and 20% of farm area was selected on the optimal farm plan under standard assumptions. Forage from perennial wheat replaced stubble over summer and grain supplement at the break of season and increased farm stock numbers.