Article ID: | iaor20084540 |
Country: | United Kingdom |
Volume: | 35 |
Issue: | 1 |
Start Page Number: | 253 |
End Page Number: | 266 |
Publication Date: | Jan 2008 |
Journal: | Computers and Operations Research |
Authors: | Higgins Andrew J., Hajkowicz Stefan, Bui Elisabeth |
Keywords: | investment, programming: multiple criteria, heuristics |
Investment in landscapes to achieve outcomes that have multiple environmental benefits has become a major priority in many countries. This gives rise to opportunities for mathematical programming methods to provide solutions on where investments could be made on the landscape, to maximise multiple environmental benefits. The problem was formulated as a multi-objective integer programming model, with objective functions representing biodiversity, water run-off and carbon sequestration. We applied a multi-objective Greedy Randomised Adaptive Search Procedure (GRASP) as an evolutionary programming method to find solutions along the Pareto front. This allows the decision maker to explore trade-offs between the objectives. A 142,000 ha case study catchment in eastern Australia was used to test the methodology and assess the sensitivity of the different and often competing environmental benefits.