Selective assessment of judgmental inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons for group decision rating

Selective assessment of judgmental inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons for group decision rating

0.00 Avg rating0 Votes
Article ID: iaor20082079
Country: United Kingdom
Volume: 34
Issue: 6
Start Page Number: 1824
End Page Number: 1841
Publication Date: Jun 2007
Journal: Computers and Operations Research
Authors: ,
Keywords: decision theory: multiple criteria
Abstract:

Pairwise comparison methods are convenient procedures for providing a sound weight vector from a set of binary comparisons between elements to be rated. In such procedures, each decision maker is asked to separately consider pairs of elements which are not necessarily independent from each other. For this reason the votes collected are liable to contain inconsistencies. In this paper we are providing a selective indicator that focuses on the inconsistencies the decision group is willing to correct in conformity with its vote strategy.

Reviews

Required fields are marked *. Your email address will not be published.