| Article ID: | iaor20081020 |
| Country: | United Kingdom |
| Volume: | 24 |
| Issue: | 3 |
| Start Page Number: | 155 |
| End Page Number: | 172 |
| Publication Date: | Apr 2005 |
| Journal: | International Journal of Forecasting |
| Authors: | Haigh Michael S. |
| Keywords: | economics, programming: dynamic |
This paper addresses several questions surrounding volatility forecasting and its use in the estimation of optimal hedging ratios. Specifically: Are there economic gains by nesting time-series econometric models (GARCH) and dynamic programming models (therefore forecasting volatility several periods out) in the estimation of hedging ratios whilst accounting for volatility in the futures bid-ask spread? Are the forecasted hedging ratios (and wealth generated) from the nested bid-ask model statistically and economically different than standard approaches? Are there times when a trader following a basic model that does not forecast outperforms a trader using the nested bid-ask model? On all counts the results are encouraging – a trader that accounts for the bid-ask spread and forecasts volatility several periods in the nested model will incur lower transactions costs and gain significantly when the market suddenly and abruptly turns.