Article ID: | iaor20073713 |
Country: | United States |
Volume: | 49 |
Issue: | 11 |
Start Page Number: | 1485 |
End Page Number: | 1503 |
Publication Date: | Nov 2003 |
Journal: | Management Science |
Authors: | Rothkopf Michael H., Peke Aleksandar |
Keywords: | bidding |
Combinatorial auctions have two features that greatly affect their design: computational complexity of winner determination and opportunities for cooperation among competitors. Dealing with these forces trade-offs between desirable auction properties such as allocative efficiency, revenue maximization, low transaction costs, fairness, failure freeness, and scalability. Computational complexity can be dealt with algorithmically by relegating the computational burden to bidders, by maintaining fairness in the face of computational limitations, by limiting biddable combinations, and by limiting the use of combinatorial bids. Combinatorial auction designs include single-round, first-price sealed bidding, Vickrey–Clarke–Groves mechanisms, uniform and market-clearing price auctions, and iterative combinatorial auctions. Combinatorial auction designs must deal with exposure problems, threshold problems, ways to keep the bidding moving at a reasonable pace, avoiding and resolving ties, and controlling complexity.