Article ID: | iaor2007334 |
Country: | Netherlands |
Volume: | 170 |
Issue: | 1 |
Start Page Number: | 172 |
End Page Number: | 191 |
Publication Date: | Apr 2006 |
Journal: | European Journal of Operational Research |
Authors: | Mousseau Vincent, Dias Luis C. |
When considering Electre's valued outranking relations, aggregation/disaggregation methodologies have difficulties in taking discordance (veto) into account. We present a partial inference procedure to compute the value of the veto-related parameters that best restore a set of outranking statements (i.e., examples that an Electre model should restore) provided by a decision maker, given fixed values for the remaining parameters of the model. This paper complements previous work on the inference of other preference-related parameters (weights, cutting level, category limits, ...), advancing toward an integrated framework of inference problems in Electre III and Tri methods. We propose mathematical programs to infer veto-related parameters, first considering only one criterion, then all criteria simultaneously, using the original version of Electre outranking relation and two variants. This paper shows that these inference procedures lead to linear programming, 0–1 linear programming, or separable programming problems, depending on the case.