Article ID: | iaor20062671 |
Country: | Canada |
Volume: | 54 |
Issue: | 2 |
Start Page Number: | 311 |
End Page Number: | 326 |
Publication Date: | Jun 2006 |
Journal: | Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics |
Authors: | Wilson William W., Nganje William E., Wagner Robert |
Keywords: | financial, economics, risk |
Price risk management confronting grain processors differs from that faced by conventional hedgers, especially when futures markets for outputs do not exist. Three components of this problem are addressed in this study. One is the relationship between input and output prices, which are impacted in part by the structure and conduct of an industry. In some cases, these are highly correlated and in others they are not. The second refers to the hedge horizon or how far forward a firm should cover its inherent and persistent short cash positions. This study incorporates these relationships into a utility maximizing model to evaluate hedging effectiveness relative to traditional hedging strategies for processors. Finally, stochastic dominance analysis is used to compare hedging strategies when output is sold at a fixed price for future delivery. Secondary data from the bread-baking industry are used for empirical analysis. Results indicate that hedging decisions are impacted by these relationships and affect firm risk exposure.