Article ID: | iaor20051735 |
Country: | Netherlands |
Volume: | 39 |
Issue: | 1 |
Start Page Number: | 67 |
End Page Number: | 85 |
Publication Date: | Mar 2005 |
Journal: | Decision Support Systems |
Authors: | Wellman Michael P., Reeves Daniel M., MacKie-Mason Jeffrey K., Osepayshvili |
Keywords: | bidding, marketing |
A market-based scheduling mechanism allocates resources indexed by time to alternative uses based on the bids of partcipating agents. Agents are typically interested in multiple time slots of the schedulable resource, with value determined by the earliest deadline by which they can complete their corresponding tasks. Despite the strong complementarities among slots induced by such preferences, it is often infeasible to deploy a mechanism that coordinates allocation across all time slots. We explore the case of separate, simultaneous markets for individual time slots, and the strategic problem it poses for bidding agents. Investigation of the straightforward bidding policy and its variants indicates that the efficacy of particular strategies depends critically on preferences and strategies of other agents, and that the strategy space is too far too complex to yield to general game-theoretic analysis. For particular environments, however, it is often possible to derive constrained equilibria through evolutionary search methods.