| Article ID: | iaor20051483 |
| Country: | United Kingdom |
| Volume: | 11 |
| Issue: | 1 |
| Start Page Number: | 97 |
| End Page Number: | 105 |
| Publication Date: | Jan 2004 |
| Journal: | International Transactions in Operational Research |
| Authors: | Ishizaka A., Lusti M. |
| Keywords: | analytic hierarchy process |
In AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), the calculated priorities are plausible only if the comparison matrices are consistent or near consistent. This condition is reached if – within the pairwise comparison process – the transitivity and reciprocity rules are respected. We describe a Prolog application which helps the decision-maker to build a consistent matrix or a matrix with a controlled error. An expert module detects rule transgressions, explains them (How-explanations), suggests alternatives (What If-explanations) and gives hints on how to continue the comparison process.