Article ID: | iaor20051483 |
Country: | United Kingdom |
Volume: | 11 |
Issue: | 1 |
Start Page Number: | 97 |
End Page Number: | 105 |
Publication Date: | Jan 2004 |
Journal: | International Transactions in Operational Research |
Authors: | Ishizaka A., Lusti M. |
Keywords: | analytic hierarchy process |
In AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), the calculated priorities are plausible only if the comparison matrices are consistent or near consistent. This condition is reached if – within the pairwise comparison process – the transitivity and reciprocity rules are respected. We describe a Prolog application which helps the decision-maker to build a consistent matrix or a matrix with a controlled error. An expert module detects rule transgressions, explains them (How-explanations), suggests alternatives (What If-explanations) and gives hints on how to continue the comparison process.