| Article ID: | iaor2004621 |
| Country: | United States |
| Volume: | 46 |
| Issue: | 4/5 |
| Start Page Number: | 347 |
| End Page Number: | 354 |
| Publication Date: | Jan 2002 |
| Journal: | Water Science and Technology |
| Authors: | Neder K.D., Carnelro G.A., Quelroz T.R., Souza M.A.A. de |
| Keywords: | geography & environment, decision theory: multiple criteria |
A multicriterion methodology is used in the evaluation and selection of the most appropriate alternative(s) for removing algae from stabilisation ponds effluents in a case study in Brasilia. For this purpose, five different natural treatment processes are tested at pilot scale: rock filter, sand filter, floating aquatic plants, constructed wetlands, and overland flow. These pilot units were constructed in Brasilia and set in parallel, each one receiving a portion of the effluent that comes from an existing wastewater treatment plant composed of preliminary treatment, UASB reactors, and high-rate stabilisation ponds. Several evaluation criteria are used in order to relate the capabilities of the post-treatment processes to the multiple objectives in this case. Two multicriterion decision-aid methods (compromise programming and ELECTRE-III) are used to select the most satisfying processes. The top ranking alternatives are indicated for subsequent studies, considering the possible implementation of these technologies to existing plants.