A decision strategy for reconfigurable manufacturing systems using analytical hierarchical process: A case study

A decision strategy for reconfigurable manufacturing systems using analytical hierarchical process: A case study

0.00 Avg rating0 Votes
Article ID: iaor2004120
Country: United Kingdom
Volume: 41
Issue: 10
Start Page Number: 2273
End Page Number: 2299
Publication Date: Jan 2003
Journal: International Journal of Production Research
Authors: ,
Keywords: decision theory: multiple criteria, analytic hierarchy process
Abstract:

This paper presents Reconfigurable Manufacturing System (RMS) characteristics through comparison with conventional manufacturing systems in order to address a design strategy towards an RMS. The strategy is considered as a part of an RMS design loop to achieve a reconfigurable stategy over its implementation period. As another part of the design loop, a reconfiguration link between market and manufacturing is presented in order to group products into families (reconfiguring products) and then assign them to the required manufacturing processes over configuration stages. In particular, the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) is employed for structuring the decision making process for the selection of a manufacturing system among feasible alternatives based on the RMS study. Manufacturing responsiveness is considered as the ability of using existing resources to reflect new environmental and technological changes quickly. The AHP model highlights manufacturing responsiveness as a new economic objective along with classical objectives such as low cost and high quality. The forward–backward process is then proposed to direct and control the design strategy under uncertain conditions during its implementation period. The proposed hierarchy is generic in structure and could be applicable to many firms by means of restructuring the criteria. The work is based on a case study in a manufacturing environment. Expert Choice software is applied to examine the structure of the proposed model and achieve synthesis/graphical results considering inconsistency ratios. The results are examined by monitoring sensitivity analysis while changing the criteria priorities. Finally, to allocate available resources to the alternative solutions, a (0–1) knapsack formulation algorithm is represented.

Reviews

Required fields are marked *. Your email address will not be published.