Article ID: | iaor199163 |
Country: | United States |
Volume: | 8 |
Issue: | 3 |
Start Page Number: | 186 |
End Page Number: | 208 |
Publication Date: | Aug 1989 |
Journal: | Journal of Operations Management |
Authors: | Krajewski Lee J., Ritzman Larry P., Bregman Robert L. |
The proper management of finished goods inventory in a multi-echelon environment is an extremely difficult problem to solve. Optimization approaches for solving this problem are intractable, and currently available heuristic techniques have serious deficiencies. Pull systems and independent demand based push systems do not adequately deal with the lumpy demand caused by the dependent relationships of stocking locations in a multi-echelon environment. Although distribution requirements planning (DRP) can be modified to handle uncertainties by adding safety stock, the process of deriving demands at lower echelons implicitly assumes deterministic conditions. In addition, no heuristic method directly considers the capacity of transportation and storage resources, or includes transportation costs. The incorporation of these additional complexities is left to the discretion of management. This study introduces a new heuristic algorithm that addresses these additional complexities. The algorithm is an improvement heuristic that can be implemented as an add-on module to a DRP system. At the core of this heuristic are two search routines (Savings and Change) for improving an additional solution determined by the DRP explosion process. The authors demonstrate this heuristic algorithm with two simple problems to provide some insight concerning its operation. The experimental results suggest that the heuristic algorithm performs extremely well when compared to the MILP based procedure. Demand uncertainty is found to have a significant effect on customer service performance, but safety stock can be added to distribution centres in actual applications to control this situation. In addition, a qualitative comparison between the MILP approach and the heuristic algorithm in this study suggests that the introduction of demand uncertainty has the effect of reducing the experimental differences between the two techniques. This result suggests that the heuristic algorithm presented in this research works best (relative to the MILP approach) in the actual environments for which it is intended.