Quality management in the manufacturing industry: Practice vs performance

Quality management in the manufacturing industry: Practice vs performance

0.00 Avg rating0 Votes
Article ID: iaor20012815
Country: Netherlands
Volume: 35
Issue: 3/4
Start Page Number: 519
End Page Number: 522
Publication Date: Dec 1998
Journal: Computers & Industrial Engineering
Authors: , ,
Keywords: quality & reliability
Abstract:

This study examines the quality management practices in the manufacturing industry in Ireland on the performance of companies. The key findings point to the existence of a moderately positive linear relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.694 between practice and performance. All the available multiple comparison tests conducted show there is a significant difference in competitive ability between firms with 20–50 employees and the other employment groups. From the perspective of competitive advantage, firms are better off being big rather than small. Also the local indigenous firms are at a competitive disadvantage unless jointly owned by foreign partners. Foreign owned firms have better quality management practices. Furthermore, it appears that being a subsidiary or part of a larger organisation and membership of a quality association contributes to better performance. Competitive sectors like Plastics and Rubber, Chemical and Electrical/Electronics have higher mean total scores than the rest and are above industry average. Firms that have larger export markets have better quality management practices.

Reviews

Required fields are marked *. Your email address will not be published.