Article ID: | iaor2000141 |
Country: | United States |
Volume: | 44 |
Issue: | 9 |
Start Page Number: | 1205 |
End Page Number: | 1217 |
Publication Date: | Sep 1998 |
Journal: | Management Science |
Authors: | Weber Elke U., Hsee Christopher |
Keywords: | finance & banking |
In this study, respondents from the P.R.C., USA, Germany, and Poland were found to differ in risk preference, as measured by buying prices for risky financial options. Chinese respondents were significantly less risk-averse in their pricing than Americans when risk preference was assessed in the traditional expected-utility framework. However, these apparent differences in risk preference were associated primarily with cultural differences in the perception of the risk of the financial options rather than with cultural differences in attitude towards perceived risk. In all cultures, an equal proportion (the majority) of respondents was willing to pay more for options perceived as less risky, i.e., were perceived-risk averse. These results are most naturally explained within a risk–return conceptualization of risky choice. They have practical implications for cross-cultural negotiation and commerce by suggesting the locus of cultural differences in risky choice that may allow for the creation of joint gains.