Article ID: | iaor1999779 |
Country: | United Kingdom |
Volume: | 5C |
Issue: | 6 |
Start Page Number: | 371 |
End Page Number: | 387 |
Publication Date: | Dec 1997 |
Journal: | Transportation Research. Part C, Emerging Technologies |
Authors: | Bonsall Peter W., Firmin Paul, Anderson Monica, Palmer Ian, Balmforth Peter |
Keywords: | computers: information, information theory |
This paper describes the validation of a route choice simulator known as VLADIMIR (Variable Legend Assessment Device for Interactive Measurement of Individual Route choice). VLADIMIR is an interactive computer-based tool designed to study drivers' route choice behaviour. It has been extensively used to obtain data on route choice in the presence of information sources such as Variable Message Signs (VMS) or In-Car Navigation devices. The simulator uses a sequence of digitized photographs to portray a real network with junctions, links, landmarks and road signs. Subject drivers are invited to make journeys between specified origins and destinations under a range of travel scenarios, during which the simulator automatically records their route choices. This paper describes validation experiments carried out during the period Summer 1994 to Autumn 1995 and reports on the results obtained. Each experiment involved a comparison of routes selected in real life with those driven under simulated conditions in VLADIMIR. The analysis included investigation of the subjects' own assessment of the realism of the VLADIMIR routes they had chosen, a comparison of models based on the real life routes with models based on VLADIMIR routes, and a statistical comparison of the two sets of routes. After an extensive series of data collection exercises and analyses, we have concluded that a well designed simulator is able to replicate real life route choices with a very high degree of detail and accuracy. Not only was VLADIMIR able to precisely replicate the route choices of drivers who were familiar with the network but it also appears capable of representing the kind of errors made and route choice strategies adopted by less familiar drivers. Furthermore, evidence is presented to suggest that it can accurately replicate route choice responses to roadside VMS information.