A multiple objective linear programming approach to power generation planning with demand-side management (DSM)

A multiple objective linear programming approach to power generation planning with demand-side management (DSM)

0.00 Avg rating0 Votes
Article ID: iaor19971419
Country: United Kingdom
Volume: 3
Issue: 3/4
Start Page Number: 305
End Page Number: 317
Publication Date: Jul 1996
Journal: International Transactions in Operational Research
Authors: , , ,
Keywords: programming: multiple criteria
Abstract:

The optimization of an economic indicator has traditionally been the sole objective function of mathematical programming models for power generation expansion planning. Recently, however, other evaluation aspects, such as environmental concerns, were also given an explicit role as objective functions in mathematical models. Models become thus more realistic so that decision makers are able to grasp the inherent conflicts and trade-offs among the distinct objectives in selecting a best compromise plan. A significant change in the planning processes has also occurred concerning new planning methodologies integrating demand-side management (DSM) techniques, in an attempt to change the levels and forms of electricity use by the consumers. This paper presents a multiple objective linear programming model for power generation expansion planning incorporating DSM. The objective functions are the total expansion cost, the environmental impact associated with the installed power capacity and the environmental impact associated with the energy output. DSM is included by modelling it as a new generating group along with the generating alternatives from the supply side. Five categories of constraints are considered related to the reliability of the supply system, the availability of the generating units, the capacity of the DSM-equivalent generating group, the total capacity installed throughout the planning period, the pollutant emissions. Some results are presented derived by using an interactive method, aimed at assisting decision makers in a progressive and selective search of good compromise solutions.

Reviews

Required fields are marked *. Your email address will not be published.