Article ID: | iaor19962120 |
Country: | United States |
Volume: | 14 |
Issue: | 2 |
Start Page Number: | 83 |
End Page Number: | 101 |
Publication Date: | Jun 1996 |
Journal: | Journal of Operations Management |
Authors: | Rohleder Thomas R., Klassen Kenneth J. |
Keywords: | scheduling, simulation: applications |
The primary issue addressed in this research is how to schedule clients as they call for appointments, without knowing which ‘types’ of clients will call at a later time. The main goal is to compare various scheduling rules in order to minimize the waiting time of the clients as well as the idle time of the service provider. Interviews with receptionists verified that they have knowledge regarding differences between clients’ service time characteristics. This information is used both to differentiate between clients and to develop various scheduling rules for those clients. A simulation model of a dynamic medical outpatient environment is developed based on insight gained from the interviews and from prior research. Two decision variables are analyzed (‘scheduling rule’ and ‘position of appointment slots left unscheduled for potential urgent calls’) while two environmental factors are varied (‘expected mean of the clients’ service time’, and ‘expected percentage of clients with low service time standard deviation compared to those with high service time standard deviation’). This resulted in 30 combinations of decision variables, each tested within 15 combinations of environmental factors. By using multiple performance measures, it is possible to improve considerably on some of the ‘best’ rules found in the current literature. The ‘best’ decisions depend on the goals of the particular clinic as well as the environmenta it encounters. However, good or best results can be obtained in all cases if clients with large service time standard deviations are scheduled toward the end of the appointment session. The best positioning of slots left open for urgent clients is less clear cut, but opinions are identified for each of a number of possible clinic goals.