Article ID: | iaor19942137 |
Country: | United States |
Volume: | 40 |
Issue: | 4 |
Start Page Number: | 516 |
End Page Number: | 534 |
Publication Date: | Apr 1994 |
Journal: | Management Science |
Authors: | Board John L.G., Sutcliffe Charles M.S. |
Keywords: | finance & banking, statistics: inference |
Forecasting the mean returns vector and the covariance matrix is a key feature in implementing portfolio theory. The performance of the Bayes-Stein method for forecasting these parameters for use in the Markowitz model (with and without short sales) was compared with that of seven other estimation methods, and three alternative portfolio selection techniques. This paper represents the first large scale empirical investigation of the usefulness of the Bayes-Stein approach using historical data. This data was drawn from the London Stock Exchange. In contrast to earlier studies, the relative performance of Bayes-Stein was mixed. While it produced reasonable estimates of the mean returns vector, there were superior methods, e.g., overall mean, for estimating the covariance matrix when short sales were permitted. When short sales were prohibited, actual portfolio performance was clearly improved, although there was little to choose between the various estimation methods.