Article ID: | iaor2016344 |
Volume: | 31 |
Issue: | 8 |
Start Page Number: | 1705 |
End Page Number: | 1716 |
Publication Date: | Dec 2015 |
Journal: | Quality and Reliability Engineering International |
Authors: | Riaz Muhammad, Ahmad Shabbir, Abbasi Saddam Akber, Miller Arden |
Keywords: | statistics: distributions, control |
Control charts are usually implemented in two phases: the retrospective phase (phase I) and the monitoring phase (phase II). The performance of any phase II control chart structure depends on the preciseness of the control limits obtained from the phase I analysis. In statistical process control, the performance of phase I dispersion charts has mainly been investigated for normal or contaminated normal distributions of the quality characteristic of interest. Little work has been carried out to investigate the performance of a wide range of possible phase I dispersion charts for processes following non‐normal distributions. The current study deals with the proper choice of a control chart for the evaluation of process dispersion in phase I. We have analyzed the performance of a wide range of dispersion control charts, including two distribution‐free structures. The performance of the control charts is evaluated in terms of probability to signal, under normal and non‐normal process setups. These results will be useful for quality control practitioners in their selection of a phase I control chart.