Article ID: | iaor20124511 |
Volume: | 48 |
Issue: | 2 |
Start Page Number: | 687 |
End Page Number: | 697 |
Publication Date: | Sep 2012 |
Journal: | Energy Policy |
Authors: | Schillebeeckx Simon J D, Parikh Priti, Bansal Rahul, George Gerard |
Keywords: | economics, politics |
Rural electrification (RE) has gained prominence over the past two decades as an effective means for improving living conditions. This growth has largely been driven by socio‐economic and political imperatives to improve rural livelihood and by technological innovation. Based on a content analysis of 232 scholarly articles, the literature is categorized into four focal lenses: technology, institutional, viability and user‐centric. We find that the first two dominate the RE debate. The viability lens has been used less frequently, whilst the user‐centric lens began to engage scholars as late as 2007. We provide an overview of the technological, institutional and viability lenses, and elaborate upon the user‐centric lens in greater detail. For energy policy and practice, we combine the four lenses to develop a business model framework that policy makers, practitioners and investors could use to assess RE projects or to design future rural electrification strategies.