Article ID: | iaor20117748 |
Volume: | 39 |
Issue: | 9 |
Start Page Number: | 5309 |
End Page Number: | 5321 |
Publication Date: | Sep 2011 |
Journal: | Energy Policy |
Authors: | Paltsev Sergey, Jacoby Henry D, Reilly John M, Ejaz Qudsia J, Morris Jennifer, OSullivan Francis, Rausch Sebastian, Winchester Niven, Kragha Oghenerume |
Keywords: | energy, simulation |
Two computable general equilibrium models, one global and the other providing U.S. regional detail, are applied to analysis of the future of U.S. natural gas. The focus is on uncertainties including the scale and cost of gas resources, the costs of competing technologies, the pattern of greenhouse gas mitigation, and the evolution of global natural gas markets. Results show that the outlook for gas over the next several decades is very favorable. In electric generation, given the unproven and relatively high cost of other low‐carbon generation alternatives, gas is likely the preferred alternative to coal. A broad GHG pricing policy would increase gas use in generation but reduce use in other sectors, on balance increasing its role from present levels. The shale gas resource is a major contributor to this optimistic view of the future of gas. Gas can be an effective bridge to a lower emissions future, but investment in the development of still lower CO