Article ID: | iaor1993606 |
Country: | Netherlands |
Volume: | 50 |
Issue: | 1 |
Start Page Number: | 76 |
End Page Number: | 84 |
Publication Date: | Jan 1991 |
Journal: | European Journal of Operational Research |
Authors: | Lootsma F. |
Keywords: | philosophy |
Using two production allocation projects in the Philips Company as a vehicle for discussion, the paper deals with a number of fundamental questions in Operations Research. First, one has the choice between a continuum of decision alternatives and a finite, usually small, number of alternatives. The choice does not merely pose a technical problem. The paper explains the preference for a discrete instead of a continuous model, and it shows the far-reaching consequences in the decision phase. Second, whereas Operations Research has been strong in the objective evaluation of the alternatives, it has generally ignored the subjective weighing. The paper sketches the potential of Operations Research in this area as well as the benefits of recent branches such as multi-criteria analysis and scenario analysis. This paper has been dedicated to Jacques Benders, at the occasion of his retirement from the Eindhoven University of Technology (June 1989). As a consultant of Philips Industries in Eindhoven, Benders cooperated during a long period of time with the present author on linear-programming applications in production allocation, trim-loss problems, traffic control, and on penalty-function methods for nonlinear programming (1963-1974).