Article ID: | iaor20134259 |
Volume: | 75 |
Issue: | 1 |
Start Page Number: | 137 |
End Page Number: | 152 |
Publication Date: | Jul 2013 |
Journal: | Theory and Decision |
Authors: | Dubreuil Benot, Grgoire Jean-Franois |
Keywords: | ethics, psychology |
This article offers a critical assessment of Cristina Bicchieri and Jon Elster’s recent attempt to distinguish between social, moral, and quasi‐moral norms. Although their typologies present interesting differences, they both distinguish types of norms on the basis of the way in which context, and especially other agents’ expectations and behavior, shapes one’s preference to comply with norms. We argue that both typologies should be abandoned because they fail to capture causally relevant features of norms. We nevertheless emphasize that both Bicchieri and Elster correctly draw attention to important and often neglected characteristics of the psychology of norm compliance.