Article ID: | iaor20131478 |
Volume: | 55 |
Issue: | 5-6 |
Start Page Number: | 82 |
End Page Number: | 94 |
Publication Date: | Apr 2013 |
Journal: | Energy Policy |
Authors: | Kruzner Kelly, Cox Kristin, Machmer Brian, Klotz Leidy |
Keywords: | design |
Passive design strategies are among the most cost‐effective methods to reduce energy consumption in buildings. However, the prevalence of these strategies in existing U.S. homes is not well understood. To help address this issue, this research evaluated a nationally‐representative sample of 1000 existing homes distributed geographically across the U.S. Using satellite images, each building was evaluated for three passive design strategies: orientation, roof color, and level of shading. Several statistically significant regional trends were identified. For example, existing homes in the High Plains, Ohio Valley, Northwest, and Southern regions show a statistically significant trend towards orientation in the East–West direction, an effective passive design strategy. Less intuitively, in terms of what would seem to be optimal passive design, buildings in the High Plains and Ohio Valley generally have lighter roof colors than buildings in the warmer Southwest region. At the national level, no statistically significant trends were found towards the passive design strategies evaluated. These trends give us no reason to believe they were a major consideration in the design of existing homes. Policy measures and education may be required to take advantage of the opportunity for cost‐effective energy savings through more widespread passive solar design.