Article ID: | iaor20125752 |
Volume: | 107 |
Issue: | 3 |
Start Page Number: | 139 |
End Page Number: | 148 |
Publication Date: | Nov 2012 |
Journal: | Reliability Engineering and System Safety |
Authors: | Helton Jon C, Hansen Clifford W, Sallaberry Cdric J |
Keywords: | statistics: inference |
The 2008 performance assessment (PA) for the proposed repository for high‐level radioactive waste at Yucca Mountain (YM), Nevada, used a Latin hypercube sample (LHS) of size 300 in the propagation of the epistemic uncertainty present in 392 analysis input variables. To assess the adequacy of this sample size, the 2008 YM PA was repeated with three independently generated (i.e., replicated) LHSs of size 300 from the indicated 392 input variables and their associated distributions. Comparison of the uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained with the three replicated LHSs showed that the three samples lead to similar results and that the use of any one of three samples would have produced the same assessment of the effects and implications of epistemic uncertainty. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained with the three LHSs were compared by (i) simple visual inspection, (ii) use of the