Article ID: | iaor201111748 |
Volume: | 40 |
Issue: | 12 |
Start Page Number: | 90 |
End Page Number: | 102 |
Publication Date: | Jan 2012 |
Journal: | Energy Policy |
Authors: | Hultman Nathan E, Pulver Simone, Guimares Leticia, Deshmukh Ranjit, Kane Jennifer |
Keywords: | energy |
The carbon market experiences of Brazil and India represent policy success stories under several criteria. A careful evaluation, however, reveals challenges to market development that should be addressed in order to make the rollout of a post‐2012 CDM more effective. We conducted firm‐level interviews covering 82 CDM plants in the sugar and cement sectors in Brazil and India, focusing on how individual managers understood the potential benefits and risks of undertaking clean development mechanism (CDM) investments. Our results indicate that the CDM operates in a far more complex way in practice than that of simply adding a marginal increment to a project's internal rate of return. Our results indicate the following: first, although anticipated revenue played a central role in most managers' decisions to pursue CDM investments, there was no standard practice to account for financial benefits of CDM investments; second, some managers identified non‐financial reputational factors as their primary motivation for pursuing CDM projects; and third, under fluctuating regulatory regimes with real immediate costs and uncertain CDM revenue, managers favored projects that often did not require carbon revenue to be viable. The post‐2012 CDM architecture can benefit from incorporating these insights, and in particular reassess goals for strict additionality and mechanisms for achieving it.