A study of a two‐phase inspection policy for a preparedness system with a defective state and heterogeneous lifetime

This paper considers an inspection policy for a single component protection or preparedness system, in which the component arises from a heterogeneous population. At any point in time, the system may be in one of three states, good, defective or failed. The system is only required in an emergency, and in order to ensure high availability of the system on‐demand, the system undergoes a sequence of inspections. Inspection determines the system state, so that if a transition from the good state occurs between inspections it is not revealed until subsequent inspection. When a defect or failure is revealed, the component is replaced. At the final inspection the component is replaced. We suppose that a component may be either weak or strong, so that the time in the good state has a distribution that is a mixture. In these circumstances, the efficacy of a two‐phase inspection policy, with an anticipated high inspection frequency in early life and low inspection frequency in later life, is considered using availability and cost criteria. The policy is investigated in the context of a valve in a natural gas supply network. If the lifetime distributions in the mixture are quite distinct, then cost savings of the order of 5% can be achieved by using the two‐phase policy in place of the simpler single phase policy. Furthermore, only if the mean time in the defective state is small or the required availability is very high does the two‐phase policy tend to mimic a burn‐in policy.