Article ID: | iaor2012929 |
Volume: | 15 |
Issue: | 1 |
Start Page Number: | 83 |
End Page Number: | 103 |
Publication Date: | Feb 2012 |
Journal: | Journal of Scheduling |
Authors: | Causmaecker Patrick, Berghe Greet, Bilgin Burak, Demeester Peter |
Keywords: | heuristics, combinatorial optimization |
Many researchers studying examination timetabling problems focus on either benchmark problems or problems from practice encountered in their institutions. Hyperheuristics are proposed as generic optimisation methods which explore the search space of heuristics rather than direct solutions. In the present study, the performance of tournament‐based hyperheuristics for the exam timetabling problem are investigated. The target instances include both the Toronto and ITC 2007 benchmarks and the examination timetabling problem at KAHO Sint‐Lieven (Ghent, Belgium). The Toronto and ITC 2007 benchmarks are post‐enrolment‐based examination timetabling problems, whereas the KAHO Sint‐Lieven case is a curriculum‐based examination timetabling problem. We drastically improve the previous (manually created) solution for the KAHO Sint‐Lieven problem by generating a timetable that satisfies all the hard and soft constraints. We also make improvements on the best known results in the examination timetabling literature for seven out of thirteen instances for the To ronto benchmarks. The results are competitive with those of the finalists of the examination timetabling track of the International Timetabling Competition.