We consider the total weighted completion time scheduling problem for parallel identical machines and precedence constraints, P| prec|\sum w
i
C
i
. This important and broad class of problems is known to be NP‐hard, even for restricted special cases, and the best known approximation algorithms have worst‐case performance that is far from optimal. However, little is known about the experimental behavior of algorithms for the general problem. This paper represents the first attempt to describe and evaluate comprehensively a range of weighted completion time scheduling algorithms.We first describe a family of combinatorial scheduling algorithms that optimally solve the single‐machine problem, and show that they can be used to achieve good performance for the multiple‐machine problem. These algorithms are efficient and find schedules that are on average within 1.5\percent of optimal over a large synthetic benchmark consisting of trees, chains, and instances with no precedence constraints. We then present several ways to create feasible schedules from nonintegral solutions to a new linear programming relaxation for the multiple‐machine problem. The best of these linear programming‐based approaches finds schedules that are within 0.2\percent of optimal over our benchmark.Finally, we describe how the scheduling phase in profile‐based program compilation can be expressed as a weighted completion time scheduling problem and apply our algorithms to a set of instances extracted from the SPECint95 compiler benchmark. For these instances with arbitrary precedence constraints, the best linear programming‐based approach finds optimal solutions in 78\percent of cases. Our results demonstrate that careful experimentation can help lead the way to high quality algorithms, even for difficult optimization problems.
