Improving the computational efficiency of metric‐based spares algorithms

Improving the computational efficiency of metric‐based spares algorithms

0.00 Avg rating0 Votes
Article ID: iaor20122080
Volume: 219
Issue: 2
Start Page Number: 324
End Page Number: 334
Publication Date: Jun 2012
Journal: European Journal of Operational Research
Authors: , ,
Keywords: inventory, combinatorial optimization, simulation: applications, maintenance, repair & replacement, transportation: air
Abstract:

We propose a new heuristic algorithm to improve the computational efficiency of the general class of Multi‐Echelon Technique for Recoverable Item Control (METRIC) problems. The objective of a METRIC‐based decision problem is to systematically determine the location and quantity of spares that either maximizes the operational availability of a system subject to a budget constraint or minimizes its cost subject to an operational availability target. This type of sparing analysis has proven essential when analyzing the sustainment policies of large‐scale, complex repairable systems such as those prevalent in the defense and aerospace industries. Additionally, the frequency of these sparing studies has recently increased as the adoption of performance‐based logistics (PBL) has increased. PBL represents a class of business strategies that converts the recurring cost associated with maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) into cost avoidance streams. Central to a PBL contract is a requirement to perform a business case analysis (BCA) and central to a BCA is the frequent need to use METRIC‐based approaches to evaluate how a supplier and customer will engage in a performance based logistics arrangement where spares decisions are critical. Due to the size and frequency of the problem there exists a need to improve the efficiency of the computationally intensive METRIC‐based solutions. We develop and validate a practical algorithm for improving the computational efficiency of a METRIC‐based approach. The accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm are analyzed through a numerical study. The algorithm shows a 94% improvement in computational efficiency while maintaining 99.9% accuracy.

Reviews

Required fields are marked *. Your email address will not be published.