Article ID: | iaor201110465 |
Volume: | 13 |
Issue: | 4 |
Start Page Number: | 439 |
End Page Number: | 451 |
Publication Date: | Sep 2011 |
Journal: | Manufacturing & Service Operations Management |
Authors: | Kouvelis Panos, Tang Sammi Yu |
Keywords: | game theory, economics, simulation: applications |
The benefits of supplier diversification are well established for price‐taking firms. In this paper, we investigate the benefits from supplier diversification for dual‐sourcing duopolists. We consider a two‐echelon supply chain in which suppliers sell components to buyers who produce and sell substitutable products. The suppliers' output processes are uncertain and modeled as having a proportional random yield. Buyers engage in a quantity‐based Cournot competition. We find that an increase in supplier correlation leads to more correlated buyers' outputs and a decrease in their profits. In the presence of end‐market competition, dual sourcing still brings value by reducing the inefficiency caused by random yield: Namely, when the suppliers' yield processes are strongly negatively correlated, dual sourcing increases the expected market output and improves the firms' profits over sole sourcing. However, unlike a monopolist firm, a duopolist does not necessarily allocate its supplier orders to minimize output variability. We generalize the main results to a two‐stage order‐quantity–output‐quantity game and to one with asymmetric suppliers.