How to derive priorities in the analytic hierarchy process: a comparative study

How to derive priorities in the analytic hierarchy process: a comparative study

0.00 Avg rating0 Votes
Article ID: iaor20073378
Country: Germany
Volume: 14
Issue: 4
Start Page Number: 387
End Page Number: 400
Publication Date: Dec 2006
Journal: Central European Journal of Operations Research
Authors: ,
Keywords: decision theory: multiple criteria
Abstract:

A heated discussion has arisen over the ‘best’ priorities derivation method. Using a Monte Carlo simulation this article compares and evaluates the solutions of four AHP ratio scaling methods: the right eigenvalue method, the left eigenvalue method, the geometric mean and the mean of normalized values. Matrices with different dimensions and degree of impurities are randomly constructed. We observe a high level of agreement between the different scaling techniques. The number of ranking contradictions increases with the dimension of the matrix and the inconsistencies. However, these contradictions affect only close priorities.

Reviews

Required fields are marked *. Your email address will not be published.